Bailey v. State

886 So. 2d 1082, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18136, 2004 WL 2724083
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bailey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 931 So. 2d 224
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 1, 2004·No. No. 2D04-875·Published

Opinion

CANADY, Judge.

William Bailey appeals the nonsummary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Bailey sought relief on several grounds as well as a belated appeal. The trial court denied all of Bailey’s claims. We affirm the denial of the postconviction claims without discussion but write to address his request for belated appeal.

On appeal, Bailey argues that the trial court erred in denying his request for belated appeal. A petition for belated appeal must be filed in the appellate court to which the appeal should have been taken. See Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(c)(2). Therefore, the trial court was without jurisdiction to either grant or deny Bailey’s request for belated appeal. The trial court’s denial is harmless, however, because while his post-conviction motion and request for belated appeal were pending in the trial court, Bailey filed a petition for belated appeal in this court, which was properly considered and denied. Bailey v. State, 2D03-3007 (Fla. 2d DCA April 22, 2004).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and SALCINES, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bailey v. State, 886 So. 2d 1082, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 18136, 2004 WL 2724083 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

886 So. 2d 1082 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.