Bailey v. State
869 So. 2d 13, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2374, 2004 WL 360002
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 2004
DocketNo. 2D03-4175
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 869 So. 2d 13 (Bailey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bailey v. State, 869 So. 2d 13, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2374, 2004 WL 360002 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to any right Bailey might have to file a timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 if he wishes to challenge the factual accuracy of the trial court’s records concerning the dates he was in jail. See King v. State, 809 So.2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State, Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Mied, Inc.
869 So. 2d 13 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
869 So. 2d 13, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2374, 2004 WL 360002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.