Bailey v. State
869 So. 2d 13, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2374, 2004 WL 360002
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 27, 2004·No. No. 2D03-4175·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed without prejudice to any right Bailey might have to file a timely motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 if he wishes to challenge the factual accuracy of the trial court’s records concerning the dates he was in jail. See King v. State, 809 So.2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bailey v. State, 869 So. 2d 13, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2374, 2004 WL 360002 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
869 So. 2d 13 (Bailey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State, Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Mied, Inc.
869 So. 2d 13 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)