Aziz v. Adducci

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan
DecidedMay 10, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-12977
StatusUnknown

This text of Aziz v. Adducci (Aziz v. Adducci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aziz v. Adducci, (E.D. Mich. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

ZERBO SAYE ACHILLE AZIZ,

Petitioner, v. Civil No. 20-12977 Honorable Victoria A. Roberts REBECCA J. ADDUCCI, Field Office Director, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Detroit Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.,

Respondents. ___________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS [ECF No. 1]

On October 20, 2020 Petitioner Zerbo Saye Achille Aziz (“Aziz”) filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. [ECF No. 1]. Aziz, a native and citizen of Burkina Faso, filed this habeas action claiming that his continued detention by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) was unlawful because it exceeded the 180-day presumptively reasonable period for removal established in Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001). At the time he filed his petition Aziz was detained at the Callhoun County Jail in Battle Creek, Michigan. Respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss arguing that Aziz’s habeas petition is moot due to Aziz’s release from custody. [ECF No. 9]. Aziz did

not respond to the motion. Article III, § 2, of the Constitution requires the existence of a case or controversy through all stages of federal judicial proceedings. This case or

controversy requirement means that, throughout the litigation, the plaintiff “must have suffered, or be threatened with, an actual injury traceable to the defendant and likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp., 494 U.S. 472, 477 (1990). Mootness results

when “events occur during the pendency of a litigation which render the court unable to grant the requested relief.” Demis v. Sniezek, 558 F.3d 508, 513 (6th Cir. 2009).

The relief Aziz seeks in his habeas petition is an order from this Court releasing him. [ECF No. 1, PageID.2]. However, according to the declaration of David Moore, a Deportation Officer with the Detroit Field Office of Enforcement and Removal Operations of ICE, Aziz was released

from custody on March 17, 2021. [ECF No. 9-1, PageID.66]. Because Petitioner was effectively afforded the relief sought in his petition, the Court concludes that there remains no actual injury which the Court could redress

with a favorable decision. See Elwood v. Sanders, 152 Fed. App'x 558 (8th Cir.2005) (unpublished opinion) (holding that petitioner's release to community corrections center pending appeal rendered moot his challenge

to the BOP's policy preventing his transfer). Accordingly, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Aziz’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Aziz’s habeas petition is DISMISSED.

IT IS ORDERED. s/ Victoria A. Roberts Victoria A. Roberts United States District Judge Dated: May 10, 2021

S:\Roberts\Roberts\Leighton\Aziz v Adducci (20-12977)\[Final] Order Dismissing Petition as Moot - Aziz v Adducci (20-12977).docx

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.
494 U.S. 472 (Supreme Court, 1990)
Zadvydas v. Davis
533 U.S. 678 (Supreme Court, 2001)
Demis v. Sniezek
558 F.3d 508 (Sixth Circuit, 2009)
Anthony R. Elwood v. Linda Sanders
152 F. App'x 558 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aziz v. Adducci, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aziz-v-adducci-mied-2021.