Austin v. State
567 So. 2d 1063, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7799, 1990 WL 152119
This text of 567 So. 2d 1063 (Austin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Austin v. State, 567 So. 2d 1063, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7799, 1990 WL 152119 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
We find no reversible error in the record of appellant’s trial for robbery with a firearm, and so affirm the conviction and sentence. We do agree that court costs and attorneys’ fees were imposed without adequate notice or hearing, and strike that provision without prejudice to the state to seek reimposition after adequate notice. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla.1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wood v. State
544 So. 2d 1004 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
567 So. 2d 1063, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7799, 1990 WL 152119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.