Austin v. State

524 So. 2d 488, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1064, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1952, 1988 WL 43411
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 4, 1988
DocketNo. 87-651
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 524 So. 2d 488 (Austin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Austin v. State, 524 So. 2d 488, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1064, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1952, 1988 WL 43411 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Before us is an appeal brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence but our review of the record revealed that the sentencing documents allow appellant a total of 400 days “plus time served ” as jail credit. Accordingly, we must remand the cause to the trial court to correct the sentences to show the exact number of days of credit. Casteel v. State, 519 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Rushing v. State, 355 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

ERVIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bengston v. State
532 So. 2d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Soriano v. HUNTON, SHIVERS, BRADY, ETC.
524 So. 2d 488 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
524 So. 2d 488, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1064, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1952, 1988 WL 43411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.