Austin v. State
This text of 524 So. 2d 488 (Austin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Before us is an appeal brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence but our review of the record revealed that the sentencing documents allow appellant a total of 400 days “plus time served ” as jail credit. Accordingly, we must remand the cause to the trial court to correct the sentences to show the exact number of days of credit. Casteel v. State, 519 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Rushing v. State, 355 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
524 So. 2d 488, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1064, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1952, 1988 WL 43411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/austin-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.