Austin v. State
524 So. 2d 488, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1064, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1952, 1988 WL 43411
Opinion
Before us is an appeal brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence but our review of the record revealed that the sentencing documents allow appellant a total of 400 days “plus time served ” as jail credit. Accordingly, we must remand the cause to the trial court to correct the sentences to show the exact number of days of credit. Casteel v. State, 519 So.2d 64 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Rushing v. State, 355 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Austin v. State, 524 So. 2d 488, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1064, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1952, 1988 WL 43411 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
524 So. 2d 488 (Austin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bengston v. State
532 So. 2d 1139 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Soriano v. HUNTON, SHIVERS, BRADY, ETC.
524 So. 2d 488 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)