Aufiero v. Town of Eastchester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aufiero v. Town of Eastchester

282 A.D. 1048, 126 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5785

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 282 A.D. 1048 (Aufiero v. Town of Eastchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aufiero v. Town of Eastchester, 282 A.D. 1048, 126 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Application on behalf of an infant for leave to serve a notice of claim against the Town of Eastohester pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e-of the General Municipal Law. It appears that eight days after the accident a letter was written by the attorney for the four-year-old infant to the clerk of the village of Tuekahoe informing him of the 'pertinent facts,- that said letter was forwarded to the clerk of the town of Eastohester, that both the village and the town caused an investigation to be made, that plaintiff’s failure to timely file a proper notice of claim was due solely to his attorney’s oversight, and that the present application was made within one year after the happening of the accident. The Town of Eastohester appeals from the order granting leave to serve the notice of claim. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application on behalf of an infant for leave to serve a notice of claim against the Town of Eastohester pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e-of the General Municipal Law. It appears that eight days after the accident a letter was written by the attorney for the four-year-old infant to the clerk of the village of Tuekahoe informing him of the 'pertinent facts,- that said letter was forwarded to the clerk of the town of Eastohester, that both the village and the town caused an investigation to be made, that plaintiff’s failure to timely file a proper notice of claim was due solely to his attorney’s oversight, and that the present application was made within one year after the happening of the accident. The Town of Eastohester appeals from the order granting leave to serve the notice of claim. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, Schmidt and Beldoek, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 1048, 126 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aufiero-v-town-of-eastchester-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack