Goglas v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goglas v. New York City Housing Authority

13 A.D.2d 939, 216 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10029

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1961

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 A.D.2d 939 (Goglas v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goglas v. New York City Housing Authority, 13 A.D.2d 939, 216 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinions

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered December 2, 1960, in Bronx County, which granted a motion by respondent for an order to file a notice of claim munc pro tune, on behalf of the infant.

Memorandum by the court.

Order entered on December 2, 1960, granting permission to file notice of claim pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law more than 90 days after accrual of infant’s cause of action reversed, on the law and on the facts, and application denied, without costs. The failure to file the notice with the proper public officer within the statutory time is here shown to have been due to the inadvertence of counsel. It has been consistently held in this Department that such a- failure is not “ by reason of ” the disability of infancy within the language of subdivision 5 of section 50-e (Ringgold v. New York City Tr. Auth., 286 App. Div. 806; Schnee v. City of New York, 285 App. Div. 1130, affd. 1 N Y 2d 697).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered December 2, 1960, in Bronx County, which granted a motion by respondent for an order to file a notice of claim munc pro tune, on behalf of the infant.

Memorandum by the court.

Order entered on December 2, 1960, granting permission to file notice of claim pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law more than 90 days after accrual of infant’s cause of action reversed, on the law and on the facts, and application denied, without costs. The failure to file the notice with the proper public officer within the statutory time is here shown to have been due to the inadvertence of counsel. It has been consistently held in this Department that such a- failure is not “ by reason of ” the disability of infancy within the language of subdivision 5 of section 50-e (Ringgold v. New York City Tr. Auth., 286 App. Div. 806; Schnee v. City of New York, 285 App. Div. 1130, affd. 1 N Y 2d 697).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 939, 216 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goglas-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1961.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack