Attorney Grievance v. Portillo

248 A.3d 318, 472 Md. 721
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedMarch 26, 2021
Docket22agpc/20
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 A.3d 318 (Attorney Grievance v. Portillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance v. Portillo, 248 A.3d 318, 472 Md. 721 (Md. 2021).

Opinion

Circuit Court for Montgomery County Case No. 482879-V

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No. 22 September Term, 2020

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

v.

ALISHA ANN PORTILLO

Barbera, C. J., McDonald Watts Hotten Getty Booth Biran

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: March 26, 2021

Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.

2021-03-26 11:40-04:00

Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * IN THE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

v. * OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 22

ALISHA ANN PORTILLO * September Term, 2020

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 26th day of March

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Alisha

Ann Portillo be, and she is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further

practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Alisha Ann

Portillo from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-761, shall

certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial

tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this

Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-709, for which

sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland

against Alisha Ann Portillo.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance v. Portillo
473 Md. 584 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.3d 318, 472 Md. 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-v-portillo-md-2021.