Attorney Grievance Commission v. Friedman

84 A.3d 580, 436 Md. 681, 2014 WL 551993, 2014 Md. LEXIS 63
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 12, 2014
DocketMisc. Docket AG No. 49
StatusPublished

This text of 84 A.3d 580 (Attorney Grievance Commission v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Friedman, 84 A.3d 580, 436 Md. 681, 2014 WL 551993, 2014 Md. LEXIS 63 (Md. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

ORDER.

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 12th day February, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Joseph Lee Friedman, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Joseph Lee Friedman from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-761 (b), for which sum judg[682]*682ment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Joseph Lee Friedman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 A.3d 580, 436 Md. 681, 2014 WL 551993, 2014 Md. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/attorney-grievance-commission-v-friedman-md-2014.