Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. Bryant

34 S.E. 350, 110 Ga. 247, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 484
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 2, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 34 S.E. 350 (Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. Bryant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Railway Co. v. Bryant, 34 S.E. 350, 110 Ga. 247, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 484 (Ga. 1899).

Opinion

Little, J.

1. No error requiring a new trial is shown to have been committed in any of the rulings made by the trial judge. The word “measure,” as used in the charge in relation to damages, was manifestly, from the context and nature of the expression, meant to be understood as referring to “amount.” Florida R. R. Co. v. Burney, 98 Ga. 11.

2. It is error for the judge, on the trial of an action to recover damages against a railroad company for personal injuries occasioned by the running and operation of its trains, to charge the jury that acts not falling within the class below indicated constitute negligence. Only the commission of those acts which are prohibited by statute, or the omission to do those things which are prescribed by statute, constitute, under such circumstances, negligence per se. Whether the commission of acts other than those so inhibited, or the omission to perform those required, constitutes negligence, is a question of fact, and must be determined by the jury, and not by the judge. 34 Ga. 330; 65 Ga. 120; 78 Ga. 694; 79 Ga. 463; 92 Ga. 187; 95 Ga. 584; 96 Ga. 177; 97 Ga. 499.

3. Other than as above indicated, we find no error in the charge of the court. _ Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring. Action for damages. Before Judge Gober. Cobb superior court. August 25, 1898. Alexander & Victor Smith, for plaintiff in error. Morris & Green, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dowis v. McCurdy
136 S.E.2d 389 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Underwood v. Atlanta & West Point Railroad
124 S.E.2d 758 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Mansfield
105 S.E.2d 804 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
F. E. Fortenberry & Sons, Inc. v. Malmberg
102 S.E.2d 667 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Jordan v. Lee
179 S.E. 739 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Augusta-Aiken Railway & Electric Corp. v. Andrews
93 S.E. 543 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Southern Railway Co. v. Williams
91 S.E. 46 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. Blacknall
50 S.E. 92 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Augusta Railway & Electric Co. v. Smith
48 S.E. 681 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. McKenney
42 S.E. 229 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Savannah, Florida & Western Ry. Co. v. Evans
115 Ga. 315 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Mayor of Milledgeville v. Wood
40 S.E. 239 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Vaughan
38 S.E. 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 S.E. 350, 110 Ga. 247, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlanta-knoxville-northern-railway-co-v-bryant-ga-1899.