Atlanta-Asheville Motor Express Inc. v. SUPERIOR GARMENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY

Supreme Court of Georgia

Atlanta-Asheville Motor Express Inc. v. SUPERIOR GARMENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY

59 S.E.2d 382, 206 Ga. 882, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 598

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMay 10, 1950

Docket17085

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 59 S.E.2d 382 (Atlanta-Asheville Motor Express Inc. v. SUPERIOR GARMENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atlanta-Asheville Motor Express Inc. v. SUPERIOR GARMENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY, 59 S.E.2d 382, 206 Ga. 882, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 598 (Ga. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Hawkins, Justice.

Where, as in this case, an attack is made bn the constitutionality of a rule promulgated by the Public Service Commission of the State of Georgia, and no construction of any constitutional provision is directly involved, but merely the applicability of plain and unambiguous constitutional provisions to such rule, the Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction. Maner v. Dykes, 183 Ga. 118 (187 S. E. 699); Head v. Edgar Bros. Co., 187 Ga. 409 (200 S. E. 792); Kirkland v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., 195 Ga. 402 (24 S. E. 2d, 676); White v. State, 196 Ga. 847 (27 S. E. 2d, 695); Smith v. State, 201 Ga. 200 (39 S. E. 2d, 313); Dade County v. State, 203 Ga. 280 (46 S. E. 2d, 345); Jackson v. State, 203 Ga. 570 (47 S. E. 2d, 588); Boyett v. State, 205 Ga. 370 (53 S. E. 2d, 919).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hawkins, Justice.

Where, as in this case, an attack is made bn the constitutionality of a rule promulgated by the Public Service Commission of the State of Georgia, and no construction of any constitutional provision is directly involved, but merely the applicability of plain and unambiguous constitutional provisions to such rule, the Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction. Maner v. Dykes, 183 Ga. 118 (187 S. E. 699); Head v. Edgar Bros. Co., 187 Ga. 409 (200 S. E. 792); Kirkland v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp., 195 Ga. 402 (24 S. E. 2d, 676); White v. State, 196 Ga. 847 (27 S. E. 2d, 695); Smith v. State, 201 Ga. 200 (39 S. E. 2d, 313); Dade County v. State, 203 Ga. 280 (46 S. E. 2d, 345); Jackson v. State, 203 Ga. 570 (47 S. E. 2d, 588); Boyett v. State, 205 Ga. 370 (53 S. E. 2d, 919).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 S.E.2d 382, 206 Ga. 882, 1950 Ga. LEXIS 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atlanta-asheville-motor-express-inc-v-superior-garment-manufacturing-ga-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack