Carter v. Bishop

Supreme Court of Georgia

Carter v. Bishop

71 S.E.2d 216, 209 Ga. 146, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 433

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 9, 1952

Docket17869

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 71 S.E.2d 216 (Carter v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carter v. Bishop, 71 S.E.2d 216, 209 Ga. 146, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 433 (Ga. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The exception here is to a judgment overruling an amended motion for a new trial in a suit for damages. It is contended that the Supreme Court has jurisdiction, however, became *147 the constitutionality of certain rules promulgated by the Public Service Commission is drawn in question in the amended grounds by excepting to the charge applying those rules. The Constitution confers upon the Supreme Court jurisdiction to construe the Constitution and to determine the constitutionality of a State law. Constitution of 1945, art. 4, sec. 2, par. 4 (Code, Ann., § 2-3704). The. various clauses of the Constitution here invoked are plain and unambiguous, hence require no construction but simply application which the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to make. Constitution of 1945, art. 4, sec. 2, par. 8 (Code, Ann., § 2-3708); Atlanta-Asheville Motor Express v. Superior Garment Mfg. Co., 206 Ga. 882 (59 S. E. 2d, 382), and citations. Furthermore, the rules here assailed are not “State laws” in contemplation of the Constitution. Maner v. Dykes, 183 Ga. 118 (187 S. E. 699). The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction of this writ of error and it will, accordingly, be transferred to that court.

No. 17869. Argued May 12, 1952 Decided June 9, 1952. Pittman, Hodge & Kinney and R. Carter Pittman, for plaintiffs in error. Mitchell & Mitchell and Keener & Keener, contra.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Duckworth, Chief Justice.

The exception here is to a judgment overruling an amended motion for a new trial in a suit for damages. It is contended that the Supreme Court has jurisdiction, however, became *147 the constitutionality of certain rules promulgated by the Public Service Commission is drawn in question in the amended grounds by excepting to the charge applying those rules. The Constitution confers upon the Supreme Court jurisdiction to construe the Constitution and to determine the constitutionality of a State law. Constitution of 1945, art. 4, sec. 2, par. 4 (Code, Ann., § 2-3704). The. various clauses of the Constitution here invoked are plain and unambiguous, hence require no construction but simply application which the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to make. Constitution of 1945, art. 4, sec. 2, par. 8 (Code, Ann., § 2-3708); Atlanta-Asheville Motor Express v. Superior Garment Mfg. Co., 206 Ga. 882 (59 S. E. 2d, 382), and citations. Furthermore, the rules here assailed are not “State laws” in contemplation of the Constitution. Maner v. Dykes, 183 Ga. 118 (187 S. E. 699). The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction of this writ of error and it will, accordingly, be transferred to that court.

No. 17869. Argued May 12, 1952 Decided June 9, 1952. Pittman, Hodge & Kinney and R. Carter Pittman, for plaintiffs in error. Mitchell & Mitchell and Keener & Keener, contra.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P.J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 S.E.2d 216, 209 Ga. 146, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carter-v-bishop-ga-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack