Suttles v. Hill Crest Cemetery Inc.

209 Ga. 160
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 10, 1952·No. No. 17871·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Head, Justice.

Where the sole question at issue on a money rule is

whether or not described property is exempt from State and county taxes under constitutional and statutory provisions exempting “places of burial,” and this question is submitted to the trial judge on the pleadings, and upon an agreed stipulation of facts, the judgment rendered does not involve a construction of the Constitution. The application of plain and unambiguous words in a constitutional provision to a statement of facts has been repeatedly held by this court to be within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals. Atlanta-Asheville Motor Express v. Superior Garment Mfg. Co., 206 Ga. 882 (59 S. E. 2d, 382), and cases cited.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Suttles v. Hill Crest Cemetery Inc., 209 Ga. 160 (Ga. 1952).

209 Ga. 160 (Suttles v. Hill Crest Cemetery Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Atlanta v. Crest Lawn Memorial Park Corp.
128 S.E.2d 722 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)