Atkinson v. Rochester Printing Co.

2 Silv. Ct. App. 149, 21 N.Y. St. Rep. 932
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 12, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Silv. Ct. App. 149 (Atkinson v. Rochester Printing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Atkinson v. Rochester Printing Co., 2 Silv. Ct. App. 149, 21 N.Y. St. Rep. 932 (N.Y. 1889).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is not a sufficient reason for moving a case from the court of appeals, second division, into this [150]*150court, that one or ev.en two of the judges of that court are disqualified from sitting upon the argument of the case there.

This motion, should, therefore, be denied.

All concur.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Silv. Ct. App. 149, 21 N.Y. St. Rep. 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atkinson-v-rochester-printing-co-ny-1889.