Home/New York Court of Appeals/Atkinson v. Rochester Printing Co.

Atkinson v. Rochester Printing Co.

2 Silv. Ct. App. 149, 21 N.Y. St. Rep. 932
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Atkinson v. Rochester Printing Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 N.Y. 168 →
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 12, 1889·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is not a sufficient reason for moving a case from the court of appeals, second division, into this [150]*150court, that one or ev.en two of the judges of that court are disqualified from sitting upon the argument of the case there.

This motion, should, therefore, be denied.

All concur.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson v. Rochester Printing Co., 2 Silv. Ct. App. 149, 21 N.Y. St. Rep. 932 (N.Y. 1889).

2 Silv. Ct. App. 149 (Atkinson v. Rochester Printing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.