Atallah v. B. H. Hubbert & Son, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Atallah v. B. H. Hubbert & Son, Inc.

168 F.2d 993, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2167

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 7, 1948

DocketNo. 5756

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 168 F.2d 993 (Atallah v. B. H. Hubbert & Son, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Atallah v. B. H. Hubbert & Son, Inc., 168 F.2d 993, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2167 (4th Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal challenging the constitutionality of the Portal-to-Portal Act of May 14, 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq. Counsel for appellants admit that it presents the precise point which was decided by this Court adversely to their contention in Seese v. Bethleham Steel Co., 4 Cir., 1948, 168 F.2d 58. Counsel for appellants here were heard as amici curiae in that appeal; and the arguments they now advance were fully considered when that case was before us. There is nothing in their present argument which calls for a reconsideration of what we have so recently decided; and we do not feel that anything need be added to what we had to say in our opinion in the Seese case. The judgment below will accordingly be affirmed on the authority of that decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal challenging the constitutionality of the Portal-to-Portal Act of May 14, 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq. Counsel for appellants admit that it presents the precise point which was decided by this Court adversely to their contention in Seese v. Bethleham Steel Co., 4 Cir., 1948, 168 F.2d 58. Counsel for appellants here were heard as amici curiae in that appeal; and the arguments they now advance were fully considered when that case was before us. There is nothing in their present argument which calls for a reconsideration of what we have so recently decided; and we do not feel that anything need be added to what we had to say in our opinion in the Seese case. The judgment below will accordingly be affirmed on the authority of that decision.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 F.2d 993, 1948 U.S. App. LEXIS 2167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/atallah-v-b-h-hubbert-son-inc-ca4-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack