Role v. J. Neils Lumber Co.

171 F.2d 706
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 10, 1949·No. No. 11924·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of Rogers Cartage Co. v. Reynolds, 6 Cir., 166 F.2d 317; Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 58; Atallah v. B. H. Hubbert & Son, 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 993, certiorari denied Cingrigani v. B. H. Hubbert & Son, 69 S.Ct. 138; Battaglia v. General Motors Corp., 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 254, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 236; Darr v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 262, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 166; Fisch v. General Motors Corp., 6 Cir., 169 F.2d 266, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 405.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Role v. J. Neils Lumber Co., 171 F.2d 706 (9th Cir. 1949).

171 F.2d 706 (Role v. J. Neils Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MacKlin v. Kaiser Co., Inc.
191 F.2d 301 (Ninth Circuit, 1951)
Bumpus v. Remington Arms Co., Inc
183 F.2d 507 (Eighth Circuit, 1950)
Tipton v. Bearl Sprott Co.
175 F.2d 432 (Ninth Circuit, 1949)
Thomas v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.
174 F.2d 711 (Third Circuit, 1949)