Potter v. Kaiser Co.
This text of 171 F.2d 705 (Potter v. Kaiser Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed upon the authority of Rogers Cartage Co. v. Reynolds, 6 Cir., 166 F.2d 317; Seese v. Bethlehem Steel Co., 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 58; Atallah v. B. H. Hubbert & Son, 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 993, certiorari denied Cingrigani v. B. H. Hubbert & Son, 69 S.Ct. 138; Battaglia v. General Motors Corp., 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 254, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 236; Darr v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 2 Cir., 169 F.2d 262, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 166; Fisch v. General Motors Corp., 6 Cir., 169 F.2d 266, certiorari denied 69 S.Ct. 405.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 F.2d 705, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/potter-v-kaiser-co-ca9-1949.