Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States

47 Cust. Ct. 331
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 Cust. Ct. 68
United States Customs Court·Decided October 3, 1961·No. No. 66118; protest 59/25143-11061 (Chicago)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of percussion hammers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 68, C.D. 2235), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States, 47 Cust. Ct. 331 (cusc 1961).

47 Cust. Ct. 331 (Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 68 (U.S. Customs Court, 1961)