Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States
46 Cust. Ct. 322
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 Cust. Ct. 68 →
United States Customs Court·Decided January 30, 1961·No. No. 65105; protest 58/23006-10299 (Chicago)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of manufactures of leather, other than reptile leather, to wit, leather picture frames, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 322 (cusc 1961).
46 Cust. Ct. 322 (Arthur Salm, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.