Arnold v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Arnold v. State

239 S.W.3d 130, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1596, 2007 WL 4105719

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 20, 2007

DocketED 89148

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 239 S.W.3d 130 (Arnold v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arnold v. State, 239 S.W.3d 130, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1596, 2007 WL 4105719 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald Arnold (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s denial, after an eviden-tiary hearing, of Movant’s Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant was convicted, following a jury trial, of one count of first-degree assault, and one count of armed criminal action. 2

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all rule citations are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006.

2

. This Court affirmed Movant's convictions in State v. Arnold, 173 S.W.3d 691 (Mo.App. E.D.2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI