State v. Arnold

173 S.W.3d 691, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1507, 2005 WL 2649462
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 2005·No. ED 85475·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald J. Arnold (hereinafter, “Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of first degree assault, Section 565.050 RSMo (2000), and armed criminal action, Section 571.015 RSMo (2000). Defendant was sentenced as a prior offender to concurrent terms of thirty years imprisonment. Defendant raises one point on appeal, claiming the trial court erred in failing to allow Defendant to question the victim regarding a pending DWI charge as this would have exposed the victim’s bias.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Arnold, 173 S.W.3d 691, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1507, 2005 WL 2649462 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

173 S.W.3d 691 (State v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arnold v. State
239 S.W.3d 130 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)