Goddard v. State

239 S.W.3d 130, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1590, 2007 WL 4105721
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 20, 2007
DocketED 89156
StatusPublished

This text of 239 S.W.3d 130 (Goddard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goddard v. State, 239 S.W.3d 130, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1590, 2007 WL 4105721 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Jerry Lee Goddard, appeals the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold v. State
239 S.W.3d 130 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 S.W.3d 130, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1590, 2007 WL 4105721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goddard-v-state-moctapp-2007.