Home/Eleventh Circuit/Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.

Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.

107 F.3d 830, 1997 WL 85573
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 18, 1997·No. No. 95-3255·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the appellees’ Suggestion of Hearing En Banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,

[-753]*-753IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be heard by this court sitting en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp., 107 F.3d 830, 1997 WL 85573 (11th Cir. 1997).

107 F.3d 830 (Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

76 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1007, 73 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 45,338, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1240 David M. Armstrong, L. Benson Barger, Wallace D. Black, Howard Brooks, Jerry A. Budd, Sonja M. Carter, Dominick C. Cizek, Carol D. Clarke-Iley, Charles H. Davis, Kenneth O. Giessuebel, Herold P. Glaser, Robert A. Havlish, Kumar Hinduja, Joseph C. Jett, Glenn E. Johnson, Robert C. Lerche, Calvin N. Lightner, George W. McGuirk James W. McLean William G. Murphy, Donald L. Prasky, Clark C. Rains, Kenneth A. Richards, Russell G. Roberts, Linda L. Ryan, Victor W. Shaw, Linton W. Smith, Michael Sylvestri, Delbert S. Turner, Edward W. Walsh, Joseph W. Williamson v. Martin Marietta Corp., Martin Marietta Technologies, Inc.
138 F.3d 1374 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.
93 F.3d 1505 (Eleventh Circuit, 1996)