Armstrong v. City of Rochester
299 N.W. 683, 211 Minn. 613, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 697
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 18, 1941·No. Nos. 32,700, 32,701, 32,712.·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
The chief justice deeming himself disqualified to participate in the consideration or decision of the questions presented by this appeal and the other justices being equally divided, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed without opinion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Armstrong v. City of Rochester, 299 N.W. 683, 211 Minn. 613, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 697 (Mich. 1941).
299 N.W. 683 (Armstrong v. City of Rochester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McDonald v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
167 N.W.2d 723 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1969)
Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller
105 N.W.2d 689 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1960)
Erickson v. Bakke
95 N.W.2d 656 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
Bunge v. Yager
52 N.W.2d 446 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1952)
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.
8 N.W.2d 471 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1943)
In Re Reinstatement of Gennow as Attorney at Law
299 N.W. 683 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)