Armstrong v. City of Rochester
299 N.W. 683, 211 Minn. 613, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 697
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJuly 18, 1941
DocketNos. 32,700, 32,701, 32,712.
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 299 N.W. 683 (Armstrong v. City of Rochester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Armstrong v. City of Rochester, 299 N.W. 683, 211 Minn. 613, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 697 (Mich. 1941).
Opinion
The chief justice deeming himself disqualified to participate in the consideration or decision of the questions presented by this appeal and the other justices being equally divided, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed without opinion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McDonald v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
167 N.W.2d 723 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1969)
Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller
105 N.W.2d 689 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1960)
Erickson v. Bakke
95 N.W.2d 656 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1958)
Bunge v. Yager
52 N.W.2d 446 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1952)
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis Brewing Co.
8 N.W.2d 471 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1943)
In Re Reinstatement of Gennow as Attorney at Law
299 N.W. 683 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
299 N.W. 683, 211 Minn. 613, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armstrong-v-city-of-rochester-minn-1941.