Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller

105 N.W.2d 689, 258 Minn. 585, 1960 Minn. LEXIS 642

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 6, 1960·No. 37,833, 37,847·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Due to the absence of Associate Justice Leroy E. Matson because of illness on the date set for hearing of this appeal, the case was heard by six of the justices of this court, and they being equally divided as to the *586 issues presented on appeal, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed without opinion. 1

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Loevinger, not having been a member of the court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

1

Armstrong v. City of Rochester, 211 Minn. 613, 299 N. W. 683; 1 Dunnell, Dig. (3 ed.) § 290, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Due to the absence of Associate Justice Leroy E. Matson because of illness on the date set for hearing of this appeal, the case was heard by six of the justices of this court, and they being equally divided as to the *586 issues presented on appeal, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed without opinion. 1

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Loevinger, not having been a member of the court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

1

Armstrong v. City of Rochester, 211 Minn. 613, 299 N. W. 683; 1 Dunnell, Dig. (3 ed.) § 290, and cases cited therein.

Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller, 105 N.W.2d 689, 258 Minn. 585, 1960 Minn. LEXIS 642 (Mich. 1960).

Pincite

105 N.W.2d 689 (Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related