Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller
This text of 105 N.W.2d 689 (Anchor Casualty Company v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Due to the absence of Associate Justice Leroy E. Matson because of illness on the date set for hearing of this appeal, the case was heard by six of the justices of this court, and they being equally divided as to the *586 issues presented on appeal, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed without opinion. 1
Affirmed.
Armstrong v. City of Rochester, 211 Minn. 613, 299 N. W. 683; 1 Dunnell, Dig. (3 ed.) § 290, and cases cited therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 N.W.2d 689, 258 Minn. 585, 1960 Minn. LEXIS 642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anchor-casualty-company-v-miller-minn-1960.