In Re Reinstatement of Gennow as Attorney at Law

299 N.W. 683, 210 Minn. 593, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 817
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJuly 11, 1941
DocketNo. 31,373.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 299 N.W. 683 (In Re Reinstatement of Gennow as Attorney at Law) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Reinstatement of Gennow as Attorney at Law, 299 N.W. 683, 210 Minn. 593, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 817 (Mich. 1941).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On the petition of Archie L. Gennow for reinstatement as an attorney at law in this state, it is ordered that said Gennow be reinstated as such attorney at law, this court, however, retaining jurisdiction of the proceedings during a probationary period of three years, during which, if said Gennow fails to put into his practice the standards fixed by the canons of ethics of the bar association, the board of law examiners may upon adequate notice to said Gennow apply to this court for a vacation of the order of reinstatement.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armstrong v. City of Rochester
299 N.W. 683 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 N.W. 683, 210 Minn. 593, 1941 Minn. LEXIS 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-reinstatement-of-gennow-as-attorney-at-law-minn-1941.