Armour v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 404, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1770
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Armour v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 Cust. Ct. 296
United States Customs Court·Decided March 28, 1950·No. No. 54145; protest 153984-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in G. D. Searle & Co. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Armour v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 404, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1770 (cusc 1950).

24 Cust. Ct. 404 (Armour v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

G. D. Searle & Co. v. United States
21 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)