Home/U.S. Customs Court/Armour v. United States

Armour v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 283, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1482
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 13, 1949
DocketNo. 53020; protests 144582-K and 144583-K (Detroit)
StatusPublished

This text of 22 Cust. Ct. 283 (Armour v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armour v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 283, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1482 (cusc 1949).

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of “ox gall concentrate,” the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in G. D. Searle & Co. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

G. D. Searle & Co. v. United States
21 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Cust. Ct. 283, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armour-v-united-states-cusc-1949.