Armour v. United States
22 Cust. Ct. 283, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1482
United States Customs Court·Decided April 13, 1949·No. No. 53020; protests 144582-K and 144583-K (Detroit)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of “ox gall concentrate,” the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in G. D. Searle & Co. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Armour v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 283, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1482 (cusc 1949).
22 Cust. Ct. 283 (Armour v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
G. D. Searle & Co. v. United States
21 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)