Armco Inc. v. United States

760 F.2d 249, 6 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2380
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMay 2, 1985
DocketAppeal No. 84-1715
StatusPublished
Cited by52 cases

This text of 760 F.2d 249 (Armco Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Armco Inc. v. United States, 760 F.2d 249, 6 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2380 (Fed. Cir. 1985).

Opinion

MARKEY, Chief Judge.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade, 590 F.Supp. 1273 (Ct.Int’l Trade 1984), that substantial evidence supported the United States International Trade Commission’s negative injury determinations with respect to imports of prestressed concrete steel wire strand from Spain, France, the United Kingdom, and Brazil.

Decision

The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by Senior Judge Maletz.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United States
495 F. Supp. 2d 1374 (Court of International Trade, 2007)
Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. v. United States
431 F. Supp. 2d 1302 (Court of International Trade, 2006)
Nitrogen Solutions Fair Trade Committee v. United States
358 F. Supp. 2d 1314 (Court of International Trade, 2005)
Steel Authority of India, Ltd. v. United States
146 F. Supp. 2d 900 (Court of International Trade, 2001)
Gerald Metals, Inc. v. United States
27 F. Supp. 2d 1351 (Court of International Trade, 1998)
Gerald Metals, Inc. v. United States
132 F.3d 716 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
Angus Chemical Co. v. United States
140 F.3d 1478 (Federal Circuit, 1998)
Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States
19 Ct. Int'l Trade 450 (Court of International Trade, 1995)
Kern-Liebers USA, Inc. v. United States
19 Ct. Int'l Trade 87 (Court of International Trade, 1995)
Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States
853 F. Supp. 431 (Court of International Trade, 1994)
Sharp Corp. v. United States
852 F. Supp. 1072 (Court of International Trade, 1994)
NEC Home Electronics, Ltd. v. United States
18 Ct. Int'l Trade 336 (Court of International Trade, 1994)
Mitsui & Co. v. United States
18 Ct. Int'l Trade 185 (Court of International Trade, 1994)
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. United States
17 Ct. Int'l Trade 1266 (Court of International Trade, 1993)
Bando Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. United States
17 Ct. Int'l Trade 798 (Court of International Trade, 1993)
Suramerica De Aleaciones Laminadas, C.A. v. United States
818 F. Supp. 348 (Court of International Trade, 1993)
Chung Ling Co., Ltd. v. United States
805 F. Supp. 45 (Court of International Trade, 1992)
Torrington Co. v. United States
790 F. Supp. 1161 (Court of International Trade, 1992)
United Engineering & Forging v. United States
779 F. Supp. 1375 (Court of International Trade, 1991)
National Knitwear & Sportswear Ass'n v. United States
779 F. Supp. 1364 (Court of International Trade, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
760 F.2d 249, 6 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/armco-inc-v-united-states-cafc-1985.