Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 632 F.3d 1246
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided November 14, 2011·No. 2010-1377·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, ' V. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., Defen,dant-Appellant. 2010-1377, -1400, -1408 _ Appea1s from the United States District C0urt for the Middle District of Pennsylvania in consolidated case nos. 01-CV-0485 and 05-CV-2622, Judge Christopher C. Con- ner. ON MOTION ORDER Up0n consideration of Seth M. Galanter’s unopposed motion to withdraw as counsel for Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., IT ls ORDERE:o THA'1‘: The motion is granted

ARL1NGToN 1NoUsTRn:s v_ BR1DGEPoRT 2 FoR THE CoURT 1 4 /s/ Jan H0rbaly Date Jan Horba1y C1erk co: Kathryn L. C1une, Esq. F"_ED . . U.S. CUURT OF EAI.S FUR Deanne E Maynard, Esq THE FEnERA»§P(§RGUn_ 324 nov 14 2011 ' .|AN HORBALY CLERK lo

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc. (Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.