Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
flannel! 5mm: Qtnurt uf Qppealfi for the jfeheral (fliirmtt
ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant,
V.
BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
2010-1377, -1400, -1408
Appeals from the United States District Court for the
Middle District of Pennsylvania in consolidated case nos. 01-CV-0485 and 05-CV-2622, Judge Christopher C. Con- ner.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Bridgeport Fittings, Inc. moves for an extension of
time until February 2, 2012, to file its response and reply brief.
Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted.
ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES V. BRIDGEPORT 2
FOR THE COURT
0 8 Isl Jan Herbal}: Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
cc: Kathryn L. Clune, Esq.
Deanne E. Maynard, ESq- v.3. cougyfimflw FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUiT
DEC 082011
, JAN HORBALY CLERK
s24
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc. (Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.