Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 10, 2012

Docket2010-1377

StatusUnpublished

This text of Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc. (Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Plain,tiff-Cross Appellan,t, » V. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., Defendant-Appellan,t. 2010-1377, -1400, -1408 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Midd1e District of Pennsylvania in consolidated case nos. 01-CV-0485 and 05-CV-2622, Judge Christopher C. Con- ner. ON MOTION ORDER Ar1ington Industries, Inc. moves without opposition for a 30-day extension of time until March 21, 2012, to file its reply brief Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.

ARL1NoToN1NnUsTR1Es v. BR1noEPoR'r 2 F0R THE COURT FEB 1 0 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly D ate J an Horba1y Clerk cc' KathrynL Clune Es F"'ED - - » q- U.S. COUHT 0F APFEALS FOR Deanne E. lVIaynard, Esq. THE FEDERN~ c'RcU" S 21 FEB 10Z012 JAN HORBAl.Y CLEiK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Plain,tiff-Cross Appellan,t, » V. BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., Defendant-Appellan,t. 2010-1377, -1400, -1408 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Midd1e District of Pennsylvania in consolidated case nos. 01-CV-0485 and 05-CV-2622, Judge Christopher C. Con- ner. ON MOTION ORDER Ar1ington Industries, Inc. moves without opposition for a 30-day extension of time until March 21, 2012, to file its reply brief Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.

ARL1NoToN1NnUsTR1Es v. BR1noEPoR'r 2 F0R THE COURT FEB 1 0 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly D ate J an Horba1y Clerk cc' KathrynL Clune Es F"'ED - - » q- U.S. COUHT 0F APFEALS FOR Deanne E. lVIaynard, Esq. THE FEDERN~ c'RcU" S 21 FEB 10Z012 JAN HORBAl.Y CLEiK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arlington-industries-inc-v-bridgeport-fittings-inc-cafc-2012.