Argentinis v. Gould
581 A.2d 1054, 216 Conn. 821, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 379
This text of 581 A.2d 1054 (Argentinis v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Argentinis v. Gould, 581 A.2d 1054, 216 Conn. 821, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 379 (Colo. 1990).
Opinion
Paul L. Gould and Paul L. Gould et al.’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 23 Conn. App. 9, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly enter judgment affirming the trial court’s decision that the plaintiff in the matter captioned Takis Argentinis v. Paul L. Gould et al. was entitled to compensatory damages in his suit for breach of construction contract and that the defendants in the matter captioned Paul L. Gould v. P.A. Argentinis et al. were also entitled to judgment in the foreclosure action?
“2. Was the Appellate Court correct in finding justification for its judgment in Edens v. Kole Construction Co., 188 Conn. 489?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Argentinis v. Gould
592 A.2d 378 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
581 A.2d 1054, 216 Conn. 821, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/argentinis-v-gould-conn-1990.