Ares Barreto v. N. Rizzo, Correctional Officer (R.C.C.F.)

District Court, N.D. New York·Decided June 2, 2026·No. 9:24-cv-00969·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ____________________________________________

ARES BARRETO,

Plaintiff,

v. 9:24-CV-969 (FJS/ML) N. RIZZO, Correctional Officer (R.C.C.F.)

Defendant. ____________________________________________

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

ARES BARRETO 190 Hoosick Street Troy, New York 12180 Plaintiff pro se

THE LAWS GROUP PLLC GREGG TYLER JOHNSON, ESQ. 646 Plank Road, Suite 205 Clifton Park, New York 12065 Attorneys for Defendant

SCULLIN, Senior Judge

ORDER

In a Report and Recommendation filed April 27, 2026, Magistrate Judge Lovric recommended that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed in its entirety, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure based on his failure to prosecute and comply with this Court's Orders and Local Rules of practice and that Defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute be granted. See Dkt. No. 36, Report and Recommendation, at 10. Plaintiff did not file any objections to these recommendations. When a party does not object to a magistrate judge's report-recommendation, the court reviews that report-recommendation for clear error or manifest injustice. See Linares v. Mahunik, No. 9:05-CV-625, 2009 WL 3165660, *10 (N.D.N.Y. July 16, 2009) (citation and footnote omitted). After conducting this review, "the Court may ‘accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the . . . recommendations made by the magistrate judge." /d. (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)). The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Lovric's April 27, 2026 Report and Recommendation for clear error and manifest injustice; and, finding none, the Court hereby ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Lovric's April 27, 2026 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute and comply with this Court's Orders and the Local Rules of practice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and the Court further ORDERS that Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint for failure to prosecute, see Dkt. No. 31, is GRANTED; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close this case; and the Court further ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on the parties in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED. . Dated: June 2, 2026 wong offs issm — Syracuse, New York Senior United States District Judge

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ares Barreto v. N. Rizzo, Correctional Officer (R.C.C.F.), (N.D.N.Y. 2026).

Ares Barreto v. N. Rizzo, Correctional Officer (R.C.C.F.) (Ares Barreto v. N. Rizzo, Correctional Officer (R.C.C.F.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 636
28 U.S.C. § 636