Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corp.

Federal Circuit

Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corp.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedApril 5, 2012

Docket2011-1638

StatusUnpublished

This text of Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corp. (Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corp., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ARCELORMITTAL FRANCE AND ARCELORMITTAL ATLANTIQUE ET LORRAINE, Plain.tiffs-Appellants, V. AK STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, AND SEVERSTAL DEARBORN, INC. AND WI-IEELING-NISSHIN INC., Defendants-Appellees. 2011-1638 Appea1 from the United StateS DiStrict C0urt for the District of De1aWare in case n0. 10-CV-0050, Judge Sue L. R0bins0n. ON MOTION ORDER

ARCELOR MITTAL» V. AK STEEL CORP 2 Arce1orMitta1 France and Arcel0rMittal At1antique et L0rraine move without opposition for a 21-day extension of ti cc: s21 me, until May 3, 2012, to file their reply brief Upon consideration thereof IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FoR THE C0URT APR 0 5 2012 /S/ J an Horba1y - Date J an Horba1y C1erk n Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Esq. Ch1'iSt0Ph@r N- SipeS, ESq- u,s.c0un"r:i)l£i?PE.ALsFon R1¢hard W. H0f:.fmann, ESq. “*EFEDE“N-°'"°“" APR 05 2012 .1ANH|JRBALY CLEBK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ARCELORMITTAL FRANCE AND ARCELORMITTAL ATLANTIQUE ET LORRAINE, Plain.tiffs-Appellants, V. AK STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, AND SEVERSTAL DEARBORN, INC. AND WI-IEELING-NISSHIN INC., Defendants-Appellees. 2011-1638 Appea1 from the United StateS DiStrict C0urt for the District of De1aWare in case n0. 10-CV-0050, Judge Sue L. R0bins0n. ON MOTION ORDER

ARCELOR MITTAL» V. AK STEEL CORP 2 Arce1orMitta1 France and Arcel0rMittal At1antique et L0rraine move without opposition for a 21-day extension of ti cc: s21 me, until May 3, 2012, to file their reply brief Upon consideration thereof IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FoR THE C0URT APR 0 5 2012 /S/ J an Horba1y - Date J an Horba1y C1erk n Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Esq. Ch1'iSt0Ph@r N- SipeS, ESq- u,s.c0un"r:i)l£i?PE.ALsFon R1¢hard W. H0f:.fmann, ESq. “*EFEDE“N-°'"°“" APR 05 2012 .1ANH|JRBALY CLEBK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arcelormittal-france-v-ak-steel-corp-cafc-2012.