Arcelormittal France v. Ak Steel Corp.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit ARCELORMITTAL FRANCE AND ARCELORMITTAL ATLANTIQUE ET LORRAINE, Plain.tiffs-Appellants, V. AK STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee, AND SEVERSTAL DEARBORN, INC. AND WI-IEELING-NISSHIN INC., Defendants-Appellees. 2011-1638 Appea1 from the United StateS DiStrict C0urt for the District of De1aWare in case n0. 10-CV-0050, Judge Sue L. R0bins0n. ON MOTION ORDER

ARCELOR MITTAL» V. AK STEEL CORP 2 Arce1orMitta1 France and Arcel0rMittal At1antique et L0rraine move without opposition for a 21-day extension of ti cc: s21 me, until May 3, 2012, to file their reply brief Upon consideration thereof IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FoR THE C0URT APR 0 5 2012 /S/ J an Horba1y - Date J an Horba1y C1erk n Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Esq. Ch1'iSt0Ph@r N- SipeS, ESq- u,s.c0un"r:i)l£i?PE.ALsFon R1¢hard W. H0f:.fmann, ESq. “*EFEDE“N-°'"°“" APR 05 2012 .1ANH|JRBALY CLEBK