Home/New York Court of Appeals/Arc Engineering Corporation v. State

Arc Engineering Corporation v. State

59 N.E.2d 180, 293 N.Y. 819, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2243
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 16, 1944·No. Claim 25495·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Claimant’s failure to comply with provisions of a construction contract requiring notification of the Chief Engineer in writing before performance of work for which extra compensation was recovered in the Court of Claims is here asserted by the State as defeating any such recovery. Our examination of the record convinces us that this defense was not properly raised in the Court of Claims, where the case was tried upon another theory. No other question of law was presented for our consideration.

Accordingly the judgment should be affirmed, with costs. (See 294 N. Y. 656.)

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arc Engineering Corporation v. State, 59 N.E.2d 180, 293 N.Y. 819, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2243 (N.Y. 1944).

59 N.E.2d 180 (Arc Engineering Corporation v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Incorporated Village of Cedarhurst v. Hanover Insurance
675 N.E.2d 822 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)
Slattery Contracting Co. v. State
56 Misc. 2d 111 (New York State Court of Claims, 1968)
Johnson v. State
46 Misc. 2d 303 (New York State Court of Claims, 1963)
Shore Bridge Corp. v. State
186 Misc. 1005 (New York State Court of Claims, 1946)
Arc Engineering Corporation v. State
60 N.E.2d 387 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)
Agostini v. State
268 A.D. 1014 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)