Arbit Trading Co. v. United States
43 Cust. Ct. 305
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Arbit Trading Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Cust. Ct. 517 →
United States Customs Court·Decided July 16, 1959·No. No. 63258; protest 320818-K (Philadelphia)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of furniture similar in all material respects to those the subject of Davies Turner & Co. v. United States (45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arbit Trading Co. v. United States, 43 Cust. Ct. 305 (cusc 1959).
43 Cust. Ct. 305 (Arbit Trading Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davies Turner & Co. v. United States
45 C.C.P.A. 39 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1957)