Aransas Project v. Bryan Shaw

774 F.3d 324, 2014 WL 7172014
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2014·No. 13-40317·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion June 30, 2014, 756 F.3d 801)

EDITH H. JONES, Circuit Judge:

The court having been polled on the modified opinion attached hereto at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

In the en banc poll, 4 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Dennis, Prado, Graves and Costa) and 11 judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Davis, Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, Elrod, Southwiek, Haynes, and Higginson).

The Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. Judge Prado, joined by Judges Dennis and Graves, dissents from the court’s denial of rehearing en banc and his dissent is attached.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aransas Project v. Bryan Shaw, 774 F.3d 324, 2014 WL 7172014 (5th Cir. 2014).

774 F.3d 324 (Aransas Project v. Bryan Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marc Veasey v. Greg Abbott
830 F.3d 216 (Fifth Circuit, 2016)
Willie Meche v. Key Energy Services, L.L.C.
777 F.3d 237 (Fifth Circuit, 2015)