Arangesan Suntharalinkam v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

Ninth Circuit

Arangesan Suntharalinkam v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

479 F.3d 1018, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5263, 2007 WL 737800

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 7, 2007

Docket04-70258

StatusPublished

This text of 479 F.3d 1018 (Arangesan Suntharalinkam v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arangesan Suntharalinkam v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, 479 F.3d 1018, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5263, 2007 WL 737800 (9th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35- *1019 3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35- *1019 3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

479 F.3d 1018, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5263, 2007 WL 737800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arangesan-suntharalinkam-v-alberto-r-gonzales-attorney-general-ca9-2007.