A.P. v. Edward Feaver
This text of 293 F. App'x 635 (A.P. v. Edward Feaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
A.P., R.K., N.M., and R.M. appeal from an order of the district court dismissing their lawsuit against thirteen state officials 1 employed by the Florida Department of Children and Family Services pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The plaintiffs brought suit against the state officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of their Four[636]*636teenth Amendment right to be safe from an unreasonable risk of physical harm while in state custody. After careful review of the allegations against each defendant, we affirm in part, and reverse in part.
As to defendants Feaver, Brown, Kana-skie, and Pollack, we find no error, and affirm the dismissal of A.P., N.M. and R.M.’s claims against them.
As to defendants Chang, Woodroof, Millikan, Worsley, Andrews, Kaufman, Des-mangles, and Wilburn, we find that the district court erred in dismissing A.P., N.M. and R.M.’s claims against them and reverse the dismissal of these claims in the Second Amended Complaint.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 F. App'x 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ap-v-edward-feaver-ca11-2008.