Aossey v. Nolting

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Aossey v. Nolting

473 So. 2d 690, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12294

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 1985

DocketNo. 84-1646

StatusPublished

This text of 473 So. 2d 690 (Aossey v. Nolting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aossey v. Nolting, 473 So. 2d 690, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12294 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the action of the trial court in enforcing an arbitration agreement in a dispute concerning securities upon authority of Oppenheimer & Co. v. Young, 456 So.2d 1175 (Fla.1984). In making this decision we recognize and agree that Oppenheimer, in effect, overruled this court’s contrary opinion in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. v. Melamed, 453 So.2d 858 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Reversed.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the action of the trial court in enforcing an arbitration agreement in a dispute concerning securities upon authority of Oppenheimer & Co. v. Young, 456 So.2d 1175 (Fla.1984). In making this decision we recognize and agree that Oppenheimer, in effect, overruled this court’s contrary opinion in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. v. Melamed, 453 So.2d 858 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Reversed.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

473 So. 2d 690, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aossey-v-nolting-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack