Aossey v. Nolting

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Aossey v. Nolting

473 So. 2d 690, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12294

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 1985·No. No. 84-1646·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the action of the trial court in enforcing an arbitration agreement in a dispute concerning securities upon authority of Oppenheimer & Co. v. Young, 456 So.2d 1175 (Fla.1984). In making this decision we recognize and agree that Oppenheimer, in effect, overruled this court’s contrary opinion in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. v. Melamed, 453 So.2d 858 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Reversed.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the action of the trial court in enforcing an arbitration agreement in a dispute concerning securities upon authority of Oppenheimer & Co. v. Young, 456 So.2d 1175 (Fla.1984). In making this decision we recognize and agree that Oppenheimer, in effect, overruled this court’s contrary opinion in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. v. Melamed, 453 So.2d 858 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

Reversed.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Aossey v. Nolting, 473 So. 2d 690, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 309, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12294 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

473 So. 2d 690 (Aossey v. Nolting) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related