Aossey v. Nolting

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Aossey v. Nolting

483 So. 2d 894, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 564, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6703

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 5, 1986

DocketNo. 84-1646

StatusPublished

This text of 483 So. 2d 894 (Aossey v. Nolting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aossey v. Nolting, 483 So. 2d 894, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 564, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6703 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

UPON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant appellees’ Motion for Rehearing, vacate our opinion filed February 6, 1985, 473 So.2d 690, and affirm the trial court’s order which granted the appellees’ Motion to Stay and to Compel Arbitration. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Byrd,U.S. 105 S.Ct. 1238, 84 L.Ed.2d 158 (1985); Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Young, 475 So.2d 221 (Fla.1985); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc., v. Me-lamed, 453 So.2d 858 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), app’d 476 So.2d 140 (Fla.1985).

It is so ORDERED.

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI