Anton C. Purisima v. Zohran Mamdani; The “Others”

S.D. New York

Anton C. Purisima v. Zohran Mamdani; The “Others”

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 6, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-09209·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANTON C. PURISIMA, Plaintiff, 25-CV-9209 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL ZOHRAN MAMDANI; THE “OTHERS”, UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On May 29, 2013, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new civil action in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Purisima v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., ECF 1:13-CV-1068, 7 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. May 29, 2013). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the court. The Court therefore dismisses the action The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 6, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANTON C. PURISIMA, Plaintiff, 25-CV-9209 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL ZOHRAN MAMDANI; THE “OTHERS”, UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On May 29, 2013, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new civil action in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Purisima v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., ECF 1:13-CV-1068, 7 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. May 29, 2013). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the court. The Court therefore dismisses the action The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 6, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Anton C. Purisima v. Zohran Mamdani; The “Others”, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Anton C. Purisima v. Zohran Mamdani; The “Others” (Anton C. Purisima v. Zohran Mamdani; The “Others”) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related