Anthony J. Roberts v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedDecember 22, 2025
Docket9:25-cv-80639
StatusUnknown

This text of Anthony J. Roberts v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (Anthony J. Roberts v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anthony J. Roberts v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, (S.D. Fla. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 9:25-cv-80639-EA

Anthony J. Roberts,

Plaintiff, v.

Progressive Casualty Insurance Company,

Defendant. ______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe’s Report and Recommendation on the Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (“Report”), entered on September 26, 2025. [ECF No. 14]. The plaintiff objects to the Report pursuant to Rule 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [ECF No. 27]. Therein, the plaintiff lodges four objections with various sub-objections. [ECF No. 27]. The defendant opposed the objections to the Report. [ECF No. 28]. When a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is timely objected to, the district court reviews the objected-to portions of the report and recommendation de novo. Wade v. Dep’t of Veteran Affs., Case No. 23-cv-20186, 2023 WL 4228182 at *1 (S.D. Fla. June 28, 2023). A party lodging an objection to a report and recommendation “must clearly advise the district court and pinpoint the specific findings that the party disagrees with.” U.S. v. Schultz, 565 F.3d 1353, 1360 (11th Cir. 2009). The Court has thus reviewed the Report de novo and is in full agreement with Judge McCabe’s comprehensive analysis and recommendations. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The Report [ECF No. 14] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 2. Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration [ECF No. 9] is GRANTED. To the extent the plaintiff wishes to pursue his claims against the defendant, he must pursue those claims with the appropriate arbitration forum. 3. This case is STAYED pending the final outcome of arbitration as required by 9 U.S.C. § 3. 4. The Clerk SHALL FILE a Notice of Compliance on the docket that a copy of this Order was mailed to the plaintiff. DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Florida, this 22nd day of December, 2025.

ED ARTAU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CC: Anthony J. Roberts 6075 Stonecrest Ct. West Palm Beach, FL 33415 PRO SE Erin Michelle Sales 200 South Orange Avenue Suite 2300 Orlando, FL 32801 4076494020 Email: esales@bakerlaw.com

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Schultz
565 F.3d 1353 (Eleventh Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Anthony J. Roberts v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anthony-j-roberts-v-progressive-casualty-insurance-company-flsd-2025.