Answer of the Justices to the Council

211 Mass. 630
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 31, 1912·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

To the Honorable Council:

Your question under date of May 1, 1912, is this: “When the law calls for action ‘by the Governor and Council/ is the Governor [631]*631to concur with a majority of the Council in- order to make its decisions effective, or is he to be considered a member of the deciding body with one vote? ”

The requirement of the Constitution is that the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court give opinions to the Governor and Council "upon important questions of law, and upon solemn occasions.” This provision has been construed to mean that such opinions may be required only respecting pending matters in order that assistance may be gained in the performance of a present duty. Opinions of the Justices, 186 Mass. 603, 608; 190 Mass. 611, 612. It has been customary for the specific pending matter to be stated or referred to in the inquiry, to the end that a more intelligent and helpful answer be given than otherwise would be possible. It is apparent that the requirement for such opinions is to be somewhat sparingly exercised. This is obvious from the phrase of the Constitution as well as from the practice which has grown up under it. It is not as to any question of law that the requisition may be made, but only upon “important questions of law.” The Legislature has made ample provision for the advice by the Attorney General as to usual legal difficulties presenting themselves either to the House of Representatives or to the Senate or to the Governor and Council. R. L. c. 7, § 8, as amended by St. 1908, c. 586. It is impossible to determine from your question whether the pending matter is of such a character that we ought to answer. Opinions of the Justices, 122 Mass. 600; 148 Mass. 623; 150 Mass. 598; 208 Mass. 614. We are of opinion that under these circumstances, and without considering whether under the Constitution the Council alone without the concurrence of the Governor may require the opinion of the Justices, we must ask respectfully to be excused from answering the question.

Arthur P. Rugg.

James M. Morton.

John W. Hammond.

William Caleb Loring.

Henry K. Braley.

Henry N. Sheldon.

Charles A. DeCourcy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Answer of the Justices to the Council, 211 Mass. 630 (Mass. 1912).

211 Mass. 630 (Answer of the Justices to the Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Opinion of the Justices to the House of Representatives
32 N.E.3d 287 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2015)
Answer of the Justices to the Acting Governor
426 Mass. 1201 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1997)
Justices to the Governor
364 Mass. 838 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1974)
Opinion of the Justices to the Governor
294 N.E.2d 346 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1973)
Answer of the Justices to the Council
291 N.E.2d 598 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1973)
Answer of the Justices to the Senate
290 Mass. 601 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Justices to the Senate & the House of Representatives
217 Mass. 607 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & Council
104 N.E. 847 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Answer of the Justices to the Governor
214 Mass. 602 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)