ANGLE v. MONTAG
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ERIE DIVISION
BRYAN ANGLE, II, ) ) 1:21-cv-00252-RAL Plaintiff ev 002
vs. RICHARD A. LANZILLO ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DR. MONTAG, ) ) Defendant ) ) ORDER SETTING HEARING
An evidentiary hearing is hereby set on Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction at ECF No. 29 for Tuesday, April 19, 2022, at 10:45 a.m. Defendant Dr. Montag’s response to the motion is due by April 6, 2022. Plaintiff should be prepared to present evidence, which may include his own testimony, the testimony of others, and/or documents, to support his position that a lack of dental care is causing or will cause him to suffer imminent, irreparable harm. See Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Botticella, 613 F.3d 102, 109 (3d Cir. 2010). Counsel for Dr. Montag is directed to coordinate with the appropriate correctional institution to ensure Plaintiff's participation. The conference will be conducted via the Court’s Zoom video conference system. Instructions for accessing the system will be emailed to counsel separately.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 16, 2022 RICHARD A. LANZILLO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
ANGLE v. MONTAG (ANGLE v. MONTAG) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.